Renault Says That 'B-Team' Setups Are Damaging to Formula 1

Renault Says That 'B-Team' Setups Are Damaging to Formula 1

Renault believes that big teams effectively buying out privateer teams to create a 'B-Team' structure is hurtful to Formula 1's competition and its attractiveness to new entrants

Just like most things in Formula 1, affiliate teams are a divisive subject. They give young talents a place to shine out of driver academies and ensure that we have teams on the grid. However, competition between the affiliates - such as Alfa Romeo and Ferrari - would most likely be frowned upon by the primary team and, therefore, discouraged.

Ferrari may not be the trendsetter when it comes to this, with Red Bull sister team Toro Rosso entering its 14th season (unbelievably), but the Italian marque is certainly the ‘market leader’ and bolsters its negotiating power on the future of F1.

Ferrari has a good relationship with Haas, supplying numerous parts for the American team. And it has further strengthened its link to the team formerly known as Sauber, bringing the Alfa Romeo brand back into F1 for the first time in 33 years last season. For 2019, Shell sponsorship, Kimi Raikkonen, Antonio Giovinazzi, a handful of technical staff and a rebranding to Alfa Romeo makes the Swiss side look distinctly like a faux-Ferrari.

A stronger link with Ferrari has almost certainly played a key role in Alfa Romeo's rise up the grid. (c) Pirelli
A stronger link with Ferrari has almost certainly played a key role in Alfa Romeo's rise up the grid. (c) Pirelli

Furthermore, there is a chance that linked teams can combine their brainpower to help the senior sides, further increasing the gap from F1 to ‘F1.5’, as well as making it harder for independent teams to succeed.

Renault Sport’s managing director Cyril Abiteboul feels that it’s a contentious subject during the Friday press conference. Renault has no such existing link, and only supplies customer engines to McLaren after Red Bull’s switch to Honda for this year.

“We could spend hours discussing that topic. It is already a challenge for a team like us who are competing against that top three teams, that have something like 30 per cent more resources than we have. If they are capable of combining their resources with other teams, or getting the benefits of synergies within the scope of a budget cap, that is a problem for us and problem for at least two other teams in the field.”

Abiteboul added that F1 must look at the subject, in case the issue becomes detrimental to new teams joining the sport in tandem with the next major rulebook shake-up at the start of 2021.

“That’s a serious topic because maybe we are saying there are three top teams and that will be it. Maybe anyone joining will have to accept that they will not be in a position to be competitive. We are extremely careful about what we are willing to happen in 2021. We are not convinced about the safeguards and the containment measures that have been put forward. We’ll continue to work with the governing bodies to hopefully get to a more satisfying outcome.”

(c) Renault Sport F1
(c) Renault Sport F1

Abiteboul’s best mate, Christian Horner, surprisingly countered the Frenchman’s concerns, pointing to the expense of creating an F1 entry. New Ferrari team boss Mattia Binotto also sided with the current model and said that any future problems must be identified and avoided. Horner said:

“The affordability of Formula 1 is extremely expensive. There is ultimately a sensible offset between needing to be a full blown constructor team and being able to acquire those non-listed parts.”

F1 CEO Chase Carey has reported that there is “real” interest from new teams for 2021 if a cost and racing-friendly solution can be found. The 2021 rules are set to be presented to the teams at the end of March.

It’s a talking point that is rapidly reaching crunch-time. But do you agree with Renault’s arguments, or is the current ‘B-Team’ model a healthy one?